# Magistral Medium vs Mistral Medium 3.1

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-mistral-medium-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 46.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 224 | 260 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $5 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | — |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | — |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | — |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | — |
| LMArena French | 1268 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | — |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.1 does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.