# Magistral Medium vs Mercury 2

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-mercury-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and Mercury 2 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Mercury 2 leads 23.0 to 8.7.
- Mercury 2 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 224 | 167 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $5 | $0.75 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
- Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 39.2% | 38.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1170 |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
- Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1362 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | — |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
- Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
- Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1303 |
| LMArena French | 1268 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
- Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1328 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
- Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1329 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
- Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1358 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

### Is Magistral Medium or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Mercury 2 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.