# Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/longcat-flash-chat-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 34.4.

## Snapshot

| | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 121 | 288 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1131 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1457 | 1100 |
| LMArena German | 1409 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1372 | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.