# Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen Max

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/longcat-flash-chat-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 22.3.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 120 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1269 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1408 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen Max?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen Max better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.