# Longcat Flash Chat vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/longcat-flash-chat-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 49.1.

## Snapshot

| | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 120 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1319 |

## Reasoning

- Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |

## Math

- Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1316 |

## Knowledge

- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1273 |

## Multilingual

- Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1408 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Longcat Flash Chat or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.