# Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama2-70b-steerlm-chat-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 31.6.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 268 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.