# Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama2-70b-steerlm-chat-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Max leads 47.8 to 31.6.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 268 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1269 |

## Math

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Qwen Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.9 vs 30.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.