# Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama2-70b-steerlm-chat-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.8 to 27.3.

## Snapshot

| | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 265 | 303 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1040 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |

## Reasoning

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1028 |

## Math

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1089 |

## Knowledge

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |

## Multilingual

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1038 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1058 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 989 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.3 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.
