# Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama2-70b-steerlm-chat-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 31.6.

## Snapshot

| | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 268 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1319 |

## Reasoning

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1302 |

## Math

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1316 |

## Knowledge

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |

## Multilingual

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.