# Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Magistral Medium

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama2-70b-steerlm-chat-vs-magistral-medium
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 31.6.

## Snapshot

| | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 35.2 |
| Rank | 268 | 227 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $5 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |

## Reasoning

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |

## Math

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1250 |

## Knowledge

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |

## Multilingual

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1227 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1254 |

## Long Context

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1295 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Magistral Medium share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.