# Llama 4 Scout vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-4-scout-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Scout scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 3 leads 39.5 to 19.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 36.9% for Llama 4 Scout and 62.3% for Step 3.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 27.4 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 323 | 145 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)
- Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9.1% | — |
| SciCode | 17% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)
- Step 3: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)
- Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36.9% | 62.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1355 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.64 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)
- Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1286 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 37.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 62.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)
- Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1236 | 1333 |
| GPQA Diamond | 51.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 74.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)
- Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1118 | 1176 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 34.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)
- Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1253 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1256 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1274 | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | 1207 | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1277 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)
- Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1332 |
| IFEval | 81.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)
- Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1265 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 36% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)
- Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1281 | 1340 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 783 | — |
| WildBench | 78% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 4 Scout better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 4 Scout or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Scout and Step 3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Scout has 43 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.