# Llama 4 Scout vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-4-scout-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Scout scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 27.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.8% for Llama 4 Scout and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.7 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 330 | 159 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)
- QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.1% | 54.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9.1% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| SciCode | 17% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)
- QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1325 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.64 | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | 57.5 | 58.3 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| DTBench | 57.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| LMCA | 12% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)
- QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.8% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1287 | 1359 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 62.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 51.8% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1235 | 1324 |
| MMLU-Pro | 74.2% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1118 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 34.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)
- QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1252 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1255 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1282 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1272 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1206 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1207 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)
- QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
| IFEval | 81.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 36% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1265 | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)
- QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 783 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1280 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| WildBench | 78% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 4 Scout better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 4 Scout or QwQ-32B better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Scout and QwQ-32B share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Scout has 43 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.