# Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-4-scout-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Scout scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 14B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 38.6 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.8% for Llama 4 Scout and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
- Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.7 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 330 | 225 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 17% | 31.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)
- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.1% | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36.9% | 49.1% |
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| DTBench | 57.9% | 64% |
| LMCA | 12% | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.64 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.8% | 66.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1287 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 62.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 51.8% | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.7% | 5.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 74.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1235 | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1118 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 34.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1255 | — |
| LMArena French | 1282 | — |
| LMArena German | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 36% | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1265 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 783 | — |
| WildBench | 78% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1280 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 14B?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

### Is Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 14B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Scout has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.