# Llama 4 Maverick vs Nova Premier 1.0

> Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Maverick costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-4-maverick-vs-nova-premier-1-0
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Maverick scores higher in 1 category and Nova Premier 1.0 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 23.0 to 10.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 65% for Llama 4 Maverick and 51.8% for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper at $0.19 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 38.3 |
| Rank | 282 | 189 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.19 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | $12.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 21% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 15.6% | — |
| SciCode | 33.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 24.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1302 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 61.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 172.97 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.9% | 44.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 4.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1281 | — |
| DTBench | 61.9% | — |
| LMCA | 15.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.2 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 42.2% | 35% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 20.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1299 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 73% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 81% | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | 51.8% |
| GPQA Diamond | 67% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 5.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1259 | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1142 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 31.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1277 | — |
| LMArena French | 1259 | — |
| LMArena German | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1293 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 90.8% | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 80% | 78.8% |
| LMArena Text | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1267 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 62% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 860 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1289 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Nova Premier 1.0?

Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Maverick costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Nova Premier 1.0?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Maverick and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Maverick has 54 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.