# Llama 3-70B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 323 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1218 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | — |
| LMArena French | 1232 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3-70B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.