# Llama 3-70B vs Qwen2-72B

> Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2-72B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 27.9 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 22.6% for Llama 3-70B and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.5 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 317 | 294 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | 54% |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| Cybench | 5% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.91 | 125.27 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | 39.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 79.3% | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1231 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | 1169 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3-70B or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen2-72B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.