# Llama 3-70B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Llama 3-70B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 42.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 54.5% for Llama 3-70B and 46.1% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 29.0 |
| Rank | 323 | 320 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 54.2% | 47.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | 118.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | — |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1218 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | 35.5% |
| MMLU | 79.3% | 72.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | — |
| LMArena French | 1232 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Llama 3-70B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 3-70B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.8 vs 36.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.