# Llama 3-70B vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.7 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 54.5% for Llama 3-70B and 44.4% for Qwen1.5-110B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 323 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | 44.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
- Qwen1.5-110B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 57.7 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1232 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1169 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3-70B or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen1.5-110B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.