# Llama 3-70B vs Qwen-14B

> Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 28.7 to 12.0.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.5 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 317 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1072 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.91 | 112.8 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1068 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 79.3% | 66.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1231 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen-14B?

Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3-70B or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen-14B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.