# Llama 3-70B vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 35.3.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 28.5 | 32.8 |
| Rank | 317 | 241 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1218 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | — |
| LMArena French | 1231 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3-70B or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.
