# Llama 3-70B vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 37.7 to 20.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 323 | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| Cybench | 5% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | 145.85 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1420 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | 1444 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1232 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1169 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3-70B or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.