# Llama 3-70B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-70b-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 323 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| Cybench | 5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1512 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1494 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3-70B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1232 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3-70B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3-70B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.