# Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Qwen2-72B

> Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-3-70b-instruct-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2-72B in 3 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 30.2 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 46.9% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and 38.5% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 291 | 300 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.32 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 14.4% | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.9% | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | 54% |
| SciCode | 26% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105)
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 31.9% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| BALROG | 23% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.33 | 125.28 |
| SimpleBench | 19.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.8% | — |
| DTBench | 59.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.6 | — |
| LiveBench | 50.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1267 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | 41.6% | 39.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 5.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.4% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1225 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 86.3% | 82.4% |
| Confabulations | 22.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1217 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1281 | 1170 |
| LMArena German | 1251 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1143 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1252 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1270 | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1242 | 1181 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 82.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1256 | 1192 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1280 | 1196 |
| LiveBench Language | 39.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than Qwen2-72B?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2-72B share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.