# Llama 3.2 90B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 34.9 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 326 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1359 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1372 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.