# Llama 3.2 90B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 36.1 to 10.4.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 326 | 123 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1398 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1418 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Solar Pro4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.