# Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 331 | 232 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.