# Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 51.8 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B and 93.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 331 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 147.65 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1449 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1477 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena German | — | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.