# Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen2-72B

> Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2-72B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 27.9 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 326 | 294 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 125.27 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 39.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 40.8% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | 82.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Qwen2-72B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen2-72B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.