# Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 30.8 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 32.9 |
| Rank | 326 | 239 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 119.41 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 80.3% | 79.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1223 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.