# Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Plus leads 22.0 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 326 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.