# Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen-7B

> Llama 3.2 90B has enough public results to be ranked (#331); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-qwen-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | — |
| Rank | 331 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 106.83 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 80.3% | 45% |
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen-7B?

Llama 3.2 90B has enough public results to be ranked (#331); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen-7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.