# Llama 3.2 90B vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

> Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-phi-3-small-8k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 25.4 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 326 | 310 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1102 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1100 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1151 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 80.3% | 75.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena French | — | 1134 |
| LMArena German | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1087 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1088 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.