# Llama 3.2 90B vs phi-3-medium 14B

> phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 25.2 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 326 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 121.18 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 17.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 27.6% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | 78% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than phi-3-medium 14B?

phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and phi-3-medium 14B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.