# Llama 3.2 90B vs Phi-1.5

> Llama 3.2 90B has enough public results to be ranked (#331); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-phi-1-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | — |
| Rank | 331 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 91.53 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 80.3% | 37.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Phi-1.5?

Llama 3.2 90B has enough public results to be ranked (#331); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Phi-1.5 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.