# Llama 3.2 90B vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Muse Spark 1.2 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 46.4 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 331 | 48 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1533 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1495 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 154.87 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1471 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1305 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1478 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1513 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1498 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1461 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1475 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1494 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.