# Llama 3.2 90B vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 36.1 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 326 | 128 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1417 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1395 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1388 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1393 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1398 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Muse Glimmer share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.