# Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 39.1 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 331 | 88 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1228 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.