# Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 37.9 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 326 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1538 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1511 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1497 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1548 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1265 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.