# Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2.5

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 35.4 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 326 | 89 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- MiMo-V2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1450 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1436 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1459 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1245 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1412 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1444 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.