# Llama 3.2 90B vs Mercury

> Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-mercury
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Llama 3.2 90B leads 21.7 to 17.5.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 331 | 199 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1322 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 21.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1285 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1260 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1239 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1266 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1191 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1282 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mercury share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.