# Llama 3.2 90B vs Mercury 2

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-mercury-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mercury 2 leads 35.6 to 21.7.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 326 | 167 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1170 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1391 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
- Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1362 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
- Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1358 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1303 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1328 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1329 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1358 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mercury 2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.