# Llama 3.2 90B vs Mercury 2.5

> Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-90b-vs-mercury-2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Mercury 2.5 leads 23.3 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 33.5 |
| Rank | 331 | 242 |
| Context | — | 260K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 90B: —
- Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 38.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
- Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
- Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mercury 2.5?

Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 4.