# Llama 3.2 3B vs Palm 2

> Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-3b-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 5 categories and Palm 2 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 26.4 to 21.1.
- Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 28.4 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 318 | 296 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)
- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | 995 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)
- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | 1005 |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)
- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | 1049 |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)
- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | 887 |
| LMArena German | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)
- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | 1010 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)
- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1101 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)
- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | 994 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Palm 2?

Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 3B or Palm 2 better for coding?

Palm 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.5 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.