# Llama 3.2 3B vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-3b-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.2 to 24.9.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.4 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 318 | 182 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | 1318 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | 1302 |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | 1272 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | 1300 |
| LMArena German | 1056 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1101 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | 1289 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 3B or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.