# Llama 3.2 3B vs Nova Premier 1.0

> Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 42× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-3b-vs-nova-premier-1-0
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 51.0 to 24.7.
- Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 38.3 |
| Rank | 321 | 189 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | $12.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 44.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |
| LMArena Math | 1126 | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena German | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1100 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Nova Premier 1.0?

Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 42× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B or Nova Premier 1.0?

Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.