# Llama 3.2 3B vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-3b-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 27.1.
- Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 28.4 | 32.8 |
| Rank | 318 | 241 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena German | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1101 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 3B or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.