# Llama 3.2 3B vs Molmo 2 8b

> Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-3b-vs-molmo-2-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 0 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 24.7.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 321 | 174 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228)
- Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | 1287 |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 3B: —
- Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281)
- Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | 1276 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena German | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275)
- Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | 1270 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1100 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307)
- Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Molmo 2 8b?

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Molmo 2 8b share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.