# Llama 3.2 3B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 4.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-3b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 24.9.
- Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.4 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 318 | 70 |
| Context | 131K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | 1501 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | 1507 |
| LMArena German | 1056 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1101 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | 1493 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 3B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 4.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is Llama 3.2 3B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.