# Llama 3.2 3B vs Llama 3-70B

> Llama 3.2 3B and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.9 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-3b-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-70B in 6 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 32.4 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 28.3% for Llama 3.2 3B and 54.5% for Llama 3-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 321 | 323 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.33 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143)
- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| Cybench | — | 5% |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228)
- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | 1114 |
| LMArena German | 1056 | 1169 |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | 1159 |
| LMArena French | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1100 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307)
- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | 1223 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Llama 3-70B?

Llama 3.2 3B and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.9 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 3.2 3B or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Llama 3-70B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.