# Llama 3.2 1B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 29.7 to 9.7.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 19.9 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 349 | 245 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1079 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.95 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 958 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1155 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 20.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.